The Journal of Phytopharmacology, 2021;10(6):520-524 ; DOI:10.31254/phyto.2021.10616
Effectiveness of different storage bags against Caryedon serratus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in storage condition
Bhut JB1 , Bharadiya AM1 , Khanpara DV1 , Madariya RB1
1. Main Oilseeds Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh- 362001, Gujarat, India
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17th November, 2021 / Accepted: 31st December, 2021
Laboratory experiments on effectiveness of different storage bags against the groundnut Bruchid, Caryedon serratus in storage condition was carried out at Main Oilseeds Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during 2016 and 2017. All the treatments were significantly superior over untreated check (i.e., Traditional jute gunny bags). Results of the experiment indicated that the lowest per cent pod damage was recorded in the treatments of high-density polythene (HDPE) bags (Adults unreleased), polythene layered gunny bags (Adults unreleased), fertilizer bags (Adults unreleased) and triple layered gunny bags (Adult unreleased) at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days days of trial installation. The high-density polythene (HDPE) bags (Adult unreleased) have also higher net gain as well as ICBR (1: 52.52) followed by high density polythene (HDPE) bags (Adult released) (1: 43.99) and polythene layered gunny bags (Adult unreleased) (1: 30.01).
Groundnut, Bruchid, Caryedon serratus and storage bags
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Bhut JB, Khanpara DV, Bharadiya AM, Madariya RB. Effectiveness of different storage bags against Caryedon serratus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in storage condition. J Phytopharmacol 2021; 10(6):520-524. doi: 10.31254/phyto.2021.10616
Creative Commons (CC) License-
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0.